Files
gw-svelte/docs/competitors.md
T
2026-05-26 08:30:08 +12:00

5.8 KiB

Competitor analysis — Auckland dog walking

A look at what two of our closest competitors do well, and what's worth borrowing for Goodwalk. Captured 2026-05-20.


Fetch Dog Walking — https://fetchdogwalking.co.nz

What they do well

  • Founder-led narrative. Andy Evans is named on the site and the philosophy ("freedom to explore in nature is an essential investment in our dog's health") is front and centre. Feels like a person, not a faceless service.
  • Content depth. They go beyond "book a walk" and publish:
    • Auckland Dog Parks guide
    • Basic Training tips
    • FAQs page
    • "Our Dogs" and "Our People" pages
  • "Dog's Highlight of the Week" — a recurring content hook that gives existing clients a reason to keep visiting the site and gives new visitors social proof.
  • Diversified offering. The 100-acre Waitakere Ranges farm-stay / boarding service is a real differentiator — they're not just selling walks, they're selling a destination.
  • Positions on authority. Tagline "Auckland's Leading Dog Walking Company" is bold and clear.
  • Strong primary CTA. Homepage contact form is short (company, dog name, phone, email, suburb, message) — low friction.

What we could implement

Idea Effort Why
Founder bio / "About Matt" page with photo and philosophy S Personality is a moat. Easy SEO win for branded searches.
"Dog of the Week" / Instagram-style spotlight on the homepage M Gives the site an "alive" feel; reuses content we likely already post to social. Could pull from the existing client_profiles table.
Dog parks of Auckland content page M Pure SEO play — high-intent local search ("best dog parks Auckland"). Drives top-of-funnel traffic.
Training tips / FAQ content hub M Same SEO logic. Also reduces support load.
"Our pack" page showing all dogs we walk (with owner consent) S Trust + community. We already collect dog photos in onboarding.

Sticks & Bones — https://sticksandbones.co.nz

What they do well

  • Process is the product. They sell their enrollment process as a trust signal:
    1. Free Meet & Greet at home
    2. Minimum two Assessment Walks before enrollment
    3. Handler matching
    4. App-based booking This makes the service feel professional and screened — they're not taking everyone.
  • Real-time walk reports via app. Clients get photos and a report after every walk. This is the single biggest differentiator and the most-mentioned feature in their testimonials.
  • Concrete trust signals.
    • Police-checked handlers
    • Secure key handling process documented
    • Handlers named individually ("Amanda walks our Cooper")
    • Maximum 4 dogs per Urban Adventure Walk (explicit cap = safety)
  • Personalised client app for scheduling, history, and reports — clients self-serve.
  • In-home dog sitting, but only for enrolled walking clients (creates retention + upsell).
  • Tagline is benefit-led, not feature-led: "dog walking made easy" + "active dogs behave better."

What we could implement

Idea Effort Why
Post-walk reports (photo + short note delivered by email or in the client portal) L This is the killer feature. Our admin dashboard already touches client_profiles — extending to walk records is a natural next step. Single biggest perceived-value lift available.
Document our enrollment process as a 3-step visual on the homepage (Enquire → Meet & Greet → First Walk) S We already do a Meet & Greet — we're just not selling it. Pure copy/design change.
Cap group size publicly (e.g. "max 4 dogs per pack") S Free trust signal if it matches reality.
Name the team with photos on About page S Sticks & Bones gets specific mentions of handlers by name in reviews — that only happens when you make handlers visible.
Police-check / insurance / first-aid badges in the footer or About page S Cheap credibility.
Client portal extensions — walk history, upcoming bookings, ability to reschedule L We already have auth + onboarding + admin dashboard. The data model is most of the way there.
"Enrolled clients only" services as a retention hook (e.g. boarding, sitting) M Mirrors S&B's sitting model. Existing clients get priority — gives a reason to stay engaged after onboarding.

Cross-cutting themes

Both competitors do these things; we should too:

  1. Named humans on the site. Founder, team, dogs. The word "we" without faces is worth less.
  2. Process as proof. Both make their intake process visible — it doubles as marketing.
  3. Service ladder, not a service. Walks → assessments → boarding/sitting → premium options. Gives clients somewhere to grow into.
  4. Locations as content. Specific Auckland park / suburb mentions throughout — local SEO and "they know my area" trust.

What Goodwalk has that they don't (lean into this)

  • Multi-step onboarding form with signature, vet, emergency contacts, behavioural profile — already more thorough than what's visible on either competitor.
  • Database-backed client profiles — foundation for a portal richer than S&B's (their app is the obvious next ceiling; we have data they don't seem to capture).
  • Brand-coloured design system already in place (Goodwalk Green / Yellow) — distinct visual identity vs. the generic blue/green dog-walker templates.

Suggested priority order

  1. Founder/team page + named handlers (1 day, big trust lift)
  2. Visualise the enrollment process on the homepage (1 day, sells the Meet & Greet we already do)
  3. Dog Parks of Auckland content page (2-3 days, SEO compounding)
  4. Post-walk reports in the client portal (1-2 weeks, table-stakes vs. S&B)
  5. Walk history / portal extensions (2-3 weeks, retention moat)